Coastkeeper sues
water authority
By Deborah Sullivan Brennan, .April 28, 2014
The
San Diego County Water Authority must do more to address the
environmental impacts of its water supply sources, San Diego
Coastkeeper said in a new lawsuit.
The
suit, filed Monday in San Diego Superior Court, cites alleged
violations of the California Environmental Quality Act.
Very
simply, the water authority is charged with providing water
to our local region, said Matt OMalley, waterkeeper
for the conservation organization. Its important
for us to see a plan that adequately accounts for environmental
and greenhouse-gas impacts.
Ken
Weinberg, director of water resources for the water authority,
said in a statement that the master plan already does so.
The
water authoritys documents not only meet the letter
of the law, they are good for the environment and good for
the region, Weinberg said.
The
authoritys water supply plan, called the Regional Water
Facilities Optimization and Master Plan Update, provides a
blueprint through 2035, including how the region could adapt
to a hotter and drier climate. The agency approved it this
year along with an environmental impact report and climate
action plan, which projects a 15 percent reduction in carbon-dioxide
emissions from 2009 to 2020.
Coastkeeper
argued in public hearings that the plans didnt adequately
account the energy used to treat and transport water, said
Everett DeLano, the Escondido land use attorney representing
the organization in the case.
For
instance, he said, it should have better addressed greenhouse
gas emissions and other environmental impacts of water imported
from Northern California and the Imperial Valley, or the expected
energy of the Poseidon desalination plant under construction
in Carlsbad.
The
agencys own ability to ensure secure water supplies
depends in part on its role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions,
OMalley said.
Climate
change could potentially cause more frequent or longer droughts,
which could lead to more prolonged water shortages for our
region, he said.
The
authority should have compensated for those impacts by placing
a higher priority on water conservation and reuse, Coastkeeper
argued in the lawsuit.
Weinberg
said, however, that the plans detail extensive efforts to
conserve and reuse water through projects such as potable
reuse of wastewater, in order to delay the need for additional
regional water supplies over the next 25 years.
The
master plan update continues to place an increased emphasis
on water conservation and local water supply development in
San Diego County, he said in the statement.
top
|